Walk through the arterial intersections of Accra—Circle, Kaneshie, Lapaz, Airport, Madina, Kasoa—and one encounters a quiet but unsettling tableau: children with bowls in their hands, toddlers strapped to older siblings’ backs, eyes trained not on schoolbooks or play, but on windshields and side mirrors.
This is no longer a marginal urban inconvenience. It is a structural social crisis unfolding in plain sight, implicating Ghana’s migration policy, its child-protection regime, and the future credibility of West Africa’s integration project.
As a Ghanaian, I write with unease but also with insistence. The growing presence of foreign child beggars on our streets—many originating from the Sahelian belt, notably Niger and Chad, alongside others from Nigeria and neighbouring states—is not a spontaneous humanitarian accident.
It is the visible end-point of policy gaps, weak enforcement, regional instability, and an emerging political economy of human exploitation that we have been reluctant to name with clarity.
What makes this failure more troubling is that Ghana is not operating in a legal vacuum. Begging itself is criminalised under the Beggars and Destitutes Act of 1969 (N.L.C.D. 392)—a statute that empowers the state to remove beggars from public spaces, rehabilitate them, and dismantle organised begging arrangements. In other words, the law anticipated this problem more than half a century ago.
The crisis we see today is therefore not the absence of legal tools, but the erosion of political will and institutional consistency to apply them—especially when the victims are children and the perpetrators hide behind the fog of transnational mobility.
In mid-2025, the Government of Ghana announced and executed the deportation of approximately 2,200 foreign nationals engaged in street begging, many of them children, citing national security, child welfare, and public order concerns. Statements from the Ministry of the Interior and the Ghana Immigration Service indicated that the exercise was to be sustained and complemented by inter-agency coordination and diplomatic engagement with source countries. Yet within months, the numbers rebounded—visibly and alarmingly—suggesting not merely operational fatigue, but a deeper mismatch between policy intent and policy outcome. This is precisely the kind of gap Ronald Dworkin warned against: when the law’s aspirations are noble, but its institutional embodiment is incoherent, justice becomes performative rather than real.
Begging as an Industry, Not an Accident.
We must discard the comforting fiction that what we are witnessing is simply poverty in motion. Evidence from migration studies, UNICEF and IOM field reports, and regional security analyses increasingly suggests that street begging—particularly involving children—has evolved into a structured, transnational trafficking economy. Children are transported across borders, lodged in overcrowded conditions, assigned daily quotas, and supervised by handlers who are rarely visible at the intersections themselves. This is exploitation, not charity.
Social media footage circulating widely in Ghana—showing heavily congested commercial vehicles conveying vulnerable populations along Sahelian routes into Greater Accra—has become part of the public consciousness. While such footage, standing alone, does not constitute proof of trafficking, the statistical, geographic, and temporal alignment is difficult to ignore. Periods of intensified insecurity and economic collapse in Niger, Chad, northern Nigeria, and parts of Burkina Faso have coincided with sharp increases in irregular migration into southern coastal states, including Ghana. UNODC and UNDP analyses of Sahelian displacement patterns demonstrate that when state capacity collapses and livelihoods evaporate, children become both the most vulnerable and the most easily commodified.
Walter Rodney taught us to interrogate systems, not symptoms. The system here is one in which poverty, porous borders, weak enforcement of existing laws, and the selective suspension of statutes like N.L.C.D. 392 converge to create profitable incentives for traffickers. Children become the cheapest labour input, their suffering externalised onto host societies and sanitised by the language of alms.
ECOWAS, Free Movement, and the Burden of Good Intentions.
The ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement of Persons, Residence and Establishment remains one of Africa’s most ambitious integration instruments. Its intent—to heal the artificial fractures of colonial borders—is historically sound and morally compelling. Yet intent is not outcome. The protocol was never designed to license organised child exploitation, nor to overwhelm municipal authorities in host countries ill-equipped to absorb mass economic migration.
The unintended consequences are now evident. Accra’s housing market is under acute strain, with informal settlements expanding faster than urban infrastructure. Food systems—already pressured by inflation, currency depreciation, and climate shocks—face increased demand at the lowest income levels. The informal economy, which absorbs both citizens and migrants, becomes saturated, depressing wages and intensifying competition. IMF and World Bank urbanisation data consistently show that when migration outpaces job creation and service provision, inflationary pressures and social friction rise.
Capital flight and informal remittance outflows—rarely captured in official balance-of-payments data—further complicate the picture. So too does the scramble for land on the peri-urban fringes of Accra and Kumasi, where unclear tenure systems enable inequitable access and quiet dispossession. These are not xenophobic claims; they are political-economic realities that any serious integration project must confront honestly.
Frantz Fanon warned that when structural injustice is left unaddressed, it mutates into social pathology. Free movement without enforceable safeguards—and without the disciplined application of domestic laws—risks becoming such a pathology, undermining rather than advancing Pan-African solidarity.
Nigeria as a Regional Fault Line.
Nigeria deserves analytical seriousness, not prejudice. With a population exceeding 220 million—more than the combined populations of several ECOWAS states—it is a demographic and economic giant whose internal stability profoundly affects its neighbours. Ghanaian census and immigration data consistently rank Nigerians as the second-largest immigrant population in Ghana after citizens of the United States, reflecting deep historical, commercial, and cultural ties.
However, Nigeria’s recent trajectory—marked by economic contraction, youth unemployment, currency instability, terrorism in the northeast, banditry in the northwest, and governance crises—has altered the migration calculus. When a country of Nigeria’s scale experiences systemic stress, migration does not occur in trickles; it occurs in waves. For smaller economies like Ghana’s, even marginal outflows translate into significant demographic pressure.
This is compounded by a wider West African context that has seen a resurgence of military coups, authoritarian drift, and widening inequality gaps over the past decade. Peer-reviewed political economy research consistently links these dynamics to displacement. Migration, in this sense, is not a moral failing of migrants; it is a rational response to collapsing opportunity structures.
Security Without Alarmism.
It would be irresponsible to ignore the security dimension. UNODC and regional security assessments have long cautioned that unmanaged migration corridors can be exploited for criminal logistics, document fraud, and, in extreme cases, recruitment and infiltration by violent networks. This is not an argument for suspicion; it is an argument for governance. States that fail to enforce their own laws humanely but firmly create vacuums that others will fill.
Policy coherence matters. Security analysis divorced from social protection becomes repression; social protection without enforcement becomes naivety. Ghana must resist both errors.
Law, Children, and a National Contradiction.
Perhaps the most damning indictment is moral and legal. Ghana prides itself—rightly—on being the first country to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Our Constitution, the Children’s Act, the Juvenile Justice Act, and even the long-standing Beggars and Destitutes Act unequivocally prohibit the economic exploitation of children and guarantee their right to education and dignity.
Yet today, children—many foreign, some Ghanaian—are being exploited in full public view, denied formal education beyond narrow religious instruction, and exposed daily to harm. This is not happening in the shadows. It is happening at traffic lights, beneath billboards celebrating national progress.
Dworkin would call this a failure of integrity: when a legal system proclaims values it does not enforce, it teaches citizens that law is symbolic, not binding.
If left unchecked, this contradiction will erode Ghana’s legal credibility, hollow out its moral authority, and weaken its leadership within ECOWAS. Worse, it will normalise the idea that some children—especially foreign, poor, and voiceless—are expendable.
A Choice Before Us.
Pan-Africanism cannot mean the abandonment of responsibility, just as sovereignty cannot mean indifference to suffering. The challenge before Ghana and ECOWAS is not whether to choose between unity and order, but whether to design institutions capable of holding both. This requires revisiting protocols, enforcing existing laws without apology, investing seriously in child protection, and dismantling trafficking networks with sustained resolve.
The children at our intersections are not policy abstractions. They are living evidence that good intentions, unmoored from disciplined execution, can produce cruel outcomes. History will not judge us by our protocols alone, but by whether we had the courage to apply our own laws when reality demanded it.
Sedem Ofori
The Author is a Ghanaian journalist, Pan-Africanist, and media manager who writes on the intersection of political economy, law, and human rights. He is a child-rights advocate and a Fellow of the Child Development and Protection Agency (CDPA).
Asaase Broadcasting Company airs on Asaase 99.5 Accra, Asaase 98.5 Kumasi, Asaase 99.7 Tamale, Asaase 100.3 Cape Coast, AsaasePa 107.3 (Accra).
Affiliates: Bawku FM 101.5, Bead FM 99.9 (Bimbilla), Mining City Radio 89.5 (Tarkwa), Nandom FM 101.9, Nyatefe Radio 94.5 (Dzodze), Sissala Radio 96.3 (Tumu), Somuaa FM 89.9 (Gushegu), Stone City 90.7 (Ho) and Wale FM 106.9 (Walewale).
Listen online: atlanticafricanews.com/, Sound Garden and TuneIn.
Follow us:
X: @asaaseradio995, @Asaase985ksi, @Asaase997tamale, @asaase1003, asaasepa1073
Instagram: asaaseradio99.5, asaase985ksi, asaase100.3, asaase99.7tamale, asaasepa107.3
LinkedIn: company/asaaseradio995. TikTok: @asaaseradio99.5
Facebook: asaase99.5, asaase985ksi, Asaase100.3, asaase99.7, AsaasePa107.3.
YouTube: AsaaseRadioXtra.
Join the conversation. Accra: call 020 000 9951/054 888 8995, WhatsApp 020 000 0995. Kumasi: call 059 415 7985 or call/WhatsApp 020 631 5260. Tamale: call/WhatsApp/SMS 053 554 6468. Cape Coast: call/WhatsApp 059 388 2652.
#AsaaseRadio
#AsaasePa
#TheVoiceofOurLand
